[whatwg] Application defined "locks"

Aaron Boodman aa at google.com
Thu Sep 10 22:07:16 PDT 2009

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM, James Robinson <jamesr at google.com> wrote:
> What about eliminating shared memory (only one context would be allowed
> access to cookies, localStorage, etc)?  It seems to be working out fine for
> DOM access and is much, much easier to reason about.

Can you clarify what you mean by this?

Is it that only shared workers can access storage, and each unique
shared worker (by way of its URL or URL+name) gets its own storage

- a

More information about the whatwg mailing list