[whatwg] Fakepath revisited
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Sun Sep 13 18:12:39 PDT 2009
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Eduard Pascual wrote:
>
> I already posted an example showing how fakepath can easily break
> compatibility with well-written sites. I explicitly asked for
> counter-arguments to it and none has been provided, but the argument
> doesn't seem to be taken in consideration at all. Hence I'm wondering
> how the compatibility arguments are treated here. Is compatibility with
> an unknown-size niche of clearly bad-designed sites more important than
> with potentially thousands of well-designed ones?
Dropping part of the file name in the rare case of a filename that
contains a backslash seems like less of an issue that failing to accept
the upload at all.
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> This is a very minor issue and I'm fine with adding this to Gecko,
> personally, except that first I really would like to see some specific
> examples of sites that need this. There remains the faint possibility
> that these sites already work in Firefox for some reason, and I'd like
> to understand why, or if they don't, then I'd like to understand why we
> haven't felt the need for this hack. Plus I think that in the spirit of
> making decisions based on data, we should expect actual data to be
> presented if possible, especially if requested, and here it seems like
> it should be easy, yet I asked for specific examples earlier and none
> have been forthcoming.
Here are some bug reports that I believe are caused by this issue:
http://forums.linksysbycisco.com/linksys/board/message?board.id=Wireless_Routers&message.id=135649
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21297706-Re-Tweak-Test-Need-help-tweaking
http://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php?s=42aad353530dfa4add91a1f2a67b2978&p=2822806&postcount=3269
Based on this my guess is just that people haven't filed this bug because
they haven't thought of it as a browser bug (notice how nobody in those
threads even mentions the browser).
One of the sites I know aout that had this bug in Firefox and Safari was:
https://www.freedfm.com/
...but it has now been fixed (search for 'strFileName.indexOf("\\")' in
the source -- it was commented out last year).
Microsoft, in their blog post, refer to a number of other sites they
tested, though they don't name them:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/03/20/rtm-platform-changes.aspx
I would love more data.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list