[whatwg] the HTML-to-Atom mapping definition
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Aug 4 13:25:39 PDT 2010
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Various problems have been reported with respect to the mapping [...]
> Please consider them raised (and still open) as per the WHATWG issue
> tracking rules.
This seems to have already been resolved (see comment 23).
There is already a note to this effect below the algorithm.
It's unclear what needs changing for this.
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
It's unclear how to support this. We could use the sizes="" attribute with
rel=icon, or reintroduce the reliance on microdata vocabularies, but in
both cases it seems better to wait for evidence that those mechanisms are
beign adopted by authors before relying on them for this feature.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
I've fixed the atom:link issue and changed "xml" to "xhtml". I couldn't
work out what the other complaints were about. If there are other
problems, please raise them on the mailing list in a clear fashion and I'd
be glad to update the spec.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg