[whatwg] Discussing WebSRT and alternatives/improvements
philipj at opera.com
Wed Aug 25 00:15:38 PDT 2010
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:54:41 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com>
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:21:28 +0200, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi>
>>> I'd be OK with not supporting karaoke or anime fansubbing at all
>>> declaratively (requiring those use cases to be addressed in
>>> with using more verbose syntax like <t t=00:01:30>...</t>.
>> I'd also be fine with not having intra-cue timing, but adding new
>> or attributes to HTML just for WebSRT seems odd.
> I'm not sure why this is particularly bad. It's likely not worth
> adding *several* elements, but one or two for a relatively significant
> subsection of HTML seems appropriate, if necessary.
> (I don't see a significant difference between <00:01:30> and <t
Would you suggest that such new elements be valid in all HTML documents,
or just in WebSRT?
Assuming that this is only for intra-cue timings, it really doesn't seem
worth the effort either way.
Using the HTML parser doesn't seem like it would be a real saving in
implementation cost, so what's the point?
More information about the whatwg