[whatwg] Validator.nu Bug: "Error: XHTML element noscript not allowed as child of XHTML element head in this context."
hugh.guiney at gmail.com
Fri Aug 27 03:32:17 PDT 2010
Ah, thanks. I guess the error is just confusing then in that it calls
it "XHTML element noscript", which led me to think that it was indeed
part of XHTML. I think some indication otherwise might prove
beneficial to users.
But, I thought XHTML5 was just an XML serialization of HTML5, so why
is this the case? I just read the rationale behind it, but despite not
being best practice shouldn't it be at the very least allowed?
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:10:44 +0200, Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney at gmail.com>
>> I am using noscript as permitted, "In a head element of an HTML
>> document, if there are no ancestor noscript elements." but still
>> getting an error from Validator.nu saying it's not allowed.
> <noscript> is HTML-only. I.e. not allowed in XHTML.
> Anne van Kesteren
More information about the whatwg