[whatwg] <INCLUDE> and links with @rel=embed
svartman95 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 11 14:42:43 PST 2010
>> An UA can support the scheme used without supporting the <source>
>> element. If <A> was used, they just had to support <A> and the scheme.
> It's still not clear to me what problem this would solve. I see what it
> would do, but why would we want that?
Backwards-compat. It's so UAs that don't support <source> can still
grasp some semantical information from the element.
More information about the whatwg