[whatwg] Customize HTML5 forms placeholder style
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Mon Feb 22 07:11:05 PST 2010
On 2/22/10 6:08 AM, Dean Edwards wrote:
> Yes, I'm suggesting redefining how :empty works. For elements that
> cannot have children
There is no such thing in XML.
> it could mean having no content. e.g. An<input> with no value or an<img> with no src.
So this would need to be defined on the document language level, not in
CSS. Sounds to me like you actually want a new psuedo-class with about
your description the matching of which CSS would defer to the document
> There is a small chance that it could break some pages I guess.
So why is it worth it, then?
> I always wanted a pseudo-class that could match<input> with no value.
> Extending :empty is probably a bad idea but something like :no-value
> would be useful.
I'd be fine with :no-value, I think, though it could easily be misused
due to unexpected situations when it happens (e.g. a text input that I'm
typing in and delete all the text but am about to type more text is
More information about the whatwg