[whatwg] Multiple file download
iaminlondon at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 15:49:09 PST 2010
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Jose Fandos <iaminlondon at gmail.com>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tim Hutt <tdhutt at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 23 February 2010 18:12, Jose Fandos <iaminlondon at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> 2) A multipart response with the files as parts, each part having
> >> >> "Content-Disposition: attachment".
> >> >
> >> > as far as I know, and I could be wrong, this would suffer from what I
> >> > described in a), i.e. there would be a dialog propping up to accept
> >> > downloaded file.
> >> So wouldn't the solution simply be to modify this behaviour? I'm sure
> >> one could write a patch for at least Firefox and Chrome to detect this
> >> situation and ask for a destination for all files...
> > It definitely would cover our needs, as long as everyone was using one of
> > those browsers. Only benefit of it being part of the spec is that
> > it might be supported by every UA out there.
> As a browser developer, I can tell you that I'm not more likely to
> implement a certain UI just because it's spelled out in a spec.
> Browsers implement things that are useful for its users, not because a
> spec asks nicely.
I meant the implementation/re-use of a package format being part of the
standard more than the UI. Though I'm happy to follow-up on the UI
I had filed a bug for mozilla (bug
this at the beginning of the year. It stands unconfirmed. If anyone can
confirm the bug, that would be swell.
I'll attach a test case to the bugs to show the multiple dialogs currently
I'm submitting the bug at bugs.webkit.org as soon as I get the account
Already submitted bug report to Opera.
> File bugs on browsers. Talk to websites to start using this. If you
> build it, they will come.
> / Jonas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the whatwg