[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol

[Ian Hickson]

On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, WeBMartians wrote:
>
> Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII. 
> There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters 
> (less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII "specifications." The same can be 
> said about the higher end.

Where the interpretation was normative, I've used the term "ANSI_X3.4-1968 
(US-ASCII)" and referenced RFC1345.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'