[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol
ian at hixie.ch
Sat Jan 30 01:02:35 PST 2010
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, WeBMartians wrote:
> Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII.
> There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters
> (less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII "specifications." The same can be
> said about the higher end.
Where the interpretation was normative, I've used the term "ANSI_X3.4-1968
(US-ASCII)" and referenced RFC1345.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg