[whatwg] Article: Growing pains afflict HTML5 standardization
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Jul 12 05:58:51 PDT 2010
On 12.07.2010 14:44, Mike Wilcox wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> - 35 errors
> That's a little different. Google purposely uses unstandardized,
> incorrect HTML in ways that still render in a browser in order to make
> it more difficult for screen scrapers. They also "break it" in a
> different way every week.
How exactly is it different?
Do you think that what Google does somehow is "better"?
As far as I can tell, it just shows that content providers continue to
send whatever happens to work, thus are not concerned at all about
validity (note: there's a permathread about this as well -- why disallow
things that are known the work reliably...).
Best regards, Julian
More information about the whatwg