[whatwg] <video> application/octet-stream
w3c at adambarth.com
Tue Jul 20 09:06:51 PDT 2010
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:41 +0200, Chris Double <chris.double at double.co.nz>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com>
>>> I'd like to hear from Mozilla, Google and Apple which of these (or other)
>>> solutions they would find acceptable.
>> You'll probably get different responses depending on who in Mozilla
>> responds. For example, I prefer option (1) and am against content
>> sniffing. Other's at Mozilla disagree I'm sure.
> I'd like to hear from those that will actually make the decision and write
> the code.
> I could go with (1) if Chrome does too.
This topic is also being discussed on public-html. On that list
Maciej explained why Safari behaves the way it does. I suspect that
information would inform this discussion.
More information about the whatwg