[whatwg] Canvas: clarification of compositing operations needed
Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalmage at gmail.com
Wed Jul 28 14:46:52 PDT 2010
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:43 PM, David Flanagan <david at davidflanagan.com> wrote:
> Firefox and Chrome disagree about the implementation of the
> destination-atop, source-in, destination-in, and source-out compositing
> operators. Test code is attached.
> Chrome doesn't touch any destination pixels that are not underneath the
> source pixels. Firefox, on the other hand, treats the entire canvas (inside
> the clipping region) as the destination and if you use the destination-in
> operator, for example, will erase any pixels outside of whatever you are
> I suspect, based on the reference to an "infinite transparent black bitmap"
> in 188.8.131.52.13 Drawing model that Firefox gets this right and Chrome gets it
> wrong, but it would be nice to have that confirmed.
> I suggest clarifying 184.108.40.206.3 Compositing to mention that the compositing
> operation takes place on all pixels within the clipping region, and that
> some compositing operators clear large portions of the canvas.
The spec is completely clear on this matter - Firefox is right,
Chrome/Safari are wrong. They do it wrongly because that's how
CoreGraphics, their graphics library, does things natively.
More information about the whatwg