[whatwg] borders on images inside links
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Jul 28 15:23:52 PDT 2010
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 17:45 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Steve Dennis <admin at subcide.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Personally, my opinion is that images in links should have borders
> > >> because otherwise how do you know it's a link?
> > >>
> > >> This seems to be a minority view, though. People have been
> > >> explicitly turning off this cue for literally over a decade.
> > >
> > > I think that browser defaults should make sense when the page is
> > > rendered Without author styles. While authors often override this
> > > particular feature, there they have the option to represent linked
> > > images in other ways such as hover states, or more attractive
> > > borders etc.
> > >
> > > Authors also often overwrite many other browser defaults such as
> > > font, styles for horizontal rules, often margins on
> > > paragraphs/headings/lists etc. But it's probably not a good idea to
> > > set these things to zero.
> > >
> > > At the end of the day, I've never found turning off borders much of
> > > a hassle as an author.
> > As Ian said, though, borders are turned off *so often* that I don't
> > think it's an actual cue to users. The actual cue I, and many normal
> > people I know of, use to see if an image is a link is to put the mouse
> > cursor over it and see if it turns into a pointer. That's still
> > present, so we should be good. It's not ideal for mobile browsers
> > without an explicit pointer, but I get along fine on my phone.
> A point that Ian also noted was where styles were turned off, or the
> page was viewed in a browser not capable of displaying styles. Yes
> they're rare, but they do exist. As he said, it's not a huge effort to
> turn them off in a stylesheet, and is often just one of many things
> people 'reset' along with table cell padding, header margins, font
> sizes, etc. These are among the most often styles that I see people
> typically change, and it's usually the same kinds of changes. Should the
> browsers all change their behaviour to follow what is the trend of
> styling now, or remain historically consistent and let the developers do
> a little more legwork.
The thing is, people have been turning it off with "border=0" for a long
time, to the point where even non-CSS browsers don't reliably show this
cue. I don't think it makes sense to insist on this (superior, IMHO)
rendering, in the face of such frequent author disagreement.
> There is another side to this as well: what bandwidth impact might this
> have if stylesheets online didn't have to consistently change the
> default behaviour for popular elements?
The impact here would be minimal either way.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg