[whatwg] Video with MIME type application/octet-stream
singer at apple.com
Fri Sep 3 14:05:08 PDT 2010
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:48 , Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> Er... Where did I propose this? I proposed speccing that there MUST NOT be
>> any sniffing, with browsers that sniff therefore being nonconformant. I
>> didn't propose allowing ad-hoc sniffing.
> Right. But the spec never allowed sniffing, and two browsers do it
> anyway. Ian has spoken to those browsers' implementers, and the
> browsers have not changed, despite knowing that they aren't following
> the spec. Do you have any particular reason to believe that they'll
> change? If not, then the situation I described is exactly what your
> proposal (i.e., the status quo) will result in, no?
Um, I think that in some cases the code that is supporting video/audio has ... historical artefacts ... which may not be entirely in line with the specs. I think it's dangerous to make assumptions in this area, especially if you then go and ask for a change in a spec. based on assumptions.
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
More information about the whatwg