[whatwg] Timed tracks: feedback compendium
philipj at opera.com
Tue Sep 14 01:33:42 PDT 2010
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:27:28 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
> <philipj at opera.com>wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:50:09 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer <
>> silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Further, with your analysis, it seemed like the following could be
>>> acceptable for comments:
>>> // Lines starting with // are comments
>> Yes, but do we need comments in the cues at all? Since SRT has no
>> this would make the cue format incompatible too, in which case we can
>> stop pretending that there's any relationship to SRT.
> Would comments be in cues? I would think they would only be allowed in
> between cues, thus making them a broken cue for existing SRT parsers.
I don't know, do we need comments anywhere? Putting them between cues
might work, but is that useful?
More information about the whatwg