[whatwg] Small consistency issue with HTML5 nav element examples
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Aug 2 15:58:21 PDT 2011
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 5/4/11, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> >> IMO browsers should implement <link>. <link> should be implementable
> >> cross-browser in CSS.
> > Unfortunately, what we want and what we get don't always match. :-)
> On a more serious note, implementing <link> can't be that hard.
It's not a matter of it being hard. Some browsers have even implemented it
and then dropped support.
> I'll probably patch my UA myself when I get the graphics layer working
> on my system (or just use links2). But I'm slowly coming to the
> conclusion that <a> should be used for creating hyperlinks that seem to
> belong to head, in a tree of html>body>aside>a, for compatibility with
> mainstream UAs.
That seems fine to me.
> >> My actual concern regard navigation links not forming a part of the
> >> linear body of the document, but still being in <body>. Navigation
> >> links will most likely be rendered "out of band," potentially only on
> >> demand and paged/scrolled seperately from the body, or at the end of
> >> the document in one dimensional renderings (such as audio and text
> >> streams). They might even be triggered without being rendered at all,
> >> such as by scrolling out of range of the current document.
> > It seems most authors desire far more control over their navigation
> > links. On many pages, it's almost as if the navigation links are more
> > important to the authors than the content, at least when you look at
> > the amount of effort put into them...
> Sadly, the things authors desire may conflict with the things users
> desire. I also desire control over navigation links (among many other
> things). From authors, I desire only content.
Unfortunately, as I said above... what we want and what we get don't
always match. There's not much we can do here to push authors further.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg