[whatwg] <ol reversed> with start value and "underflow"
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Dec 13 13:31:27 PST 2011
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Alexis Menard wrote:
> Well it doesn't clearly say it but if I quote :
> "The reversed attribute is a boolean attribute. If present, it
> indicates that the list is a descending list (..., 3, 2, 1). If the
> attribute is omitted, the list is an ascending list (1, 2, 3, ...)."
> Maybe we should replace "indicates that the list is a descending list
> (..., 3, 2, 1)" by "indicates that the list is a descending list (...,
> 3, 2, 1, 0, -1,...).
> That was *for me* the confusing part but maybe it is just me.
I recommend reading this section again:
In particular, note that the paragraph you quote doesn't include any
"MUST" statements. The first sentence references a definition that gives
an authoring conformance criteria. The second sentence doesn't say
anything normative at all; it just describes the meaning of the attribute.
The spec tries to be very explicit about stuff. You should never have to
read between the lines.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg