[whatwg] Cryptographically strong random numbers
w3c at adambarth.com
Sat Feb 12 14:20:11 PST 2011
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Cedric Vivier <cedricv at neonux.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:40, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a specific reason for this limitation?
>>> Imho it should throw only for Float32Array and Float64Array since
>>> unbounded random floating numbers does not really make sense
>>> (including because of NaN and +inf -inf).
>> I went with a whitelist approach. If there are other specific types
>> that you think we should whitelist, we can certainly do that. Why
>> types, specifically, would you like to see supported?
> All integer types can have use cases imo so there is no reason to
> impose an articifial limitation  except for sanity-checking (floats
> does not make sense here), ie:
> Int8Array, UInt8Array, Int16Array, UInt16Array, Int32Array, UInt32Array
More information about the whatwg