[whatwg] Google Feedback on the HTML5 media a11y specifications
Philip Jägenstedt
philipj at opera.com
Tue Feb 15 08:26:52 PST 2011
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:57:02 +0100, Glenn Maynard <glenn at zewt.org> wrote:
> Following up on a use case discussed earlier, an alternative approach
> for adding mid-cue comments, such as editor notes, would be to wrap
> them in a class: <c.c>comment</c>. It's a little awkward, but has the
> advantage of allowing the comments to be displayed within the
> displayed captions just by changing the style attached to the class.
I think it's not a bad idea.
Pro:
- No new escapes
- Optionally visible when previewing e.g. a translation
Cons:
- not hidden by default
- therefore, requires either assuming CSS support (boo!) or removing all
comments before publishing
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com>
> wrote:
>> 1. Authors are encouraged to not manually line-break
>
> I think that, no matter what you do, people will insert line breaks in
> cues. I'd follow the HTML model here: convert newlines to spaces and
> have a separate, explicit line break like <br> if needed, so people
> don't manually line-break unless they actually mean to.
>
> Related to line breaking, should there be an escape? Inserting
> nbsp literally into files is somewhat annoying for authoring, since
> they're indistinguishable from regular spaces.
I would kind of prefer not going down that path, otherwise we should also
add and escapes for all kinds of things that are hard to type. I
naively hope that editors that don't suck at Unicode will spring into
existence.
--
Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software
More information about the whatwg
mailing list