[whatwg] Proposal for separating script downloads and execution
glenn at zewt.org
Tue Feb 22 19:42:26 PST 2011
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
> I also think the other side benefits of this approach are significant, so
>> long as they don't make it too hard to implement. That really needs
>> implementor feedback--if you can give that, let me know if you want a more
>> detailed recap.
> I don't think I do. Proposal 3 sounded fine to me last I saw it.
Including execute() being synchronous, raising SyntaxError exceptions for
parse errors, and uncaught exceptions from the script being propagated up
through execute() to its caller?
More information about the whatwg