[whatwg] Make radio button group suffering from being missing
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Jan 7 14:06:28 PST 2011
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>
> Currently, when a radio button is required, it will suffer from being
> missing if no radio elements in the radio button group is checked.
> However, radio elements in the group will not suffer from being missing
> if they do not have the required attribute. In other words, if you try
> to style invalid elements with :invalid, and do:
> <input type='radio' name='s' value='M' required>
> <input type='radio' name='s' value='F'>
> only the first element will be styled.
>
> I think we should move the requirement to the radio button group that
> way: "The radio button group suffers from being missing if one of the
> input elements in the radio button group is required and all of them
> have a checkedness that is false." and radio elements would have this
> constraint: "If the radio button group is suffering from being missing,
> the element is suffering from being missing.".
>
> That way, all radio elements in the same radio button group will have
> the same validity state. That would be less annoying for authors and
> error proof while making things clearer (IMO).
The basic idea behind this design is that type=radio seems to have been
designed to keep each control as independent as possible -- before we
started fiddling with it in WF2, the only way type=radio controls had any
relationship to other type=radio controls was with their behaviour when
they were clicked. Now, for required="", we needed a little more than
that, because otherwise required="" was essentially useless for radio
buttons, but I tried to be faithful to the original design and kept it as
independent as possible.
> I'm thinking of implementing that for Gecko 2.0/Firefox 4 so I would
> like to know if you know any reason that would make the current behavior
> more appropriate than the one described here.
In the end I'll spec whatever gets implemented. What do other browser
vendors feel about this? Should we make required="" on any one type=radio
control affect the validity of all the other controls? Or should we stick
to the independent basis of this API?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list