[whatwg] a rel=attachment

[Ian Hickson]

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > 
> > That isn't really in scope for the HTML spec, it's something either 
> > for the HTTP spec or the Content-Disposition spec (if HTTP doesn't 
> > define th header itself) to define.
> 
> Is there a specific reason why the new text doesn't mention 
> Content-Disposition anymore?

Not only does the new text mention Content-Disposition, it actually refers 
to its specification multiple times. Are you looking at the right diff?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'