[whatwg] date meta-tag invalid

aykut.sensoy at bild.de aykut.sensoy at bild.de
Mon Jul 18 06:49:50 PDT 2011

hi, this was only a mistake in the e-mail. you can see the meta-tag in the
source code live at www.stylebook.de


Am 18.07.11 15:06 schrieb "Mat Carey" unter <mat at matcarey.co.uk>:

>I'm not aware of the context, but is your problem the lack of spaces?
>You said:
>> <metaname="date"content="#" />
>Did you mean:
><meta name="date" content="#" />
>Mat Carey
>On 18 Jul 2011, at 13:54, <aykut.sensoy at bild.de> wrote:
>> According to the w3c Validator the  <metaname="date"content="#" /> tag
>>is invalid. In the WHATWG MetaExtensions List there is no registered
>>extension, no specification and no proposal for the date meta-tag.
>> The only alternative for "date" is a proposal called "created", which
>>however doesn't meet the requirements for registration . For our SEO
>>team the date meta-tag contains some of the most important information
>>about a webpage.
>> What would be a w3c-valid way to implement a creation date meta-tag in
>> Kind Regards
>> Aykut Sensoy

More information about the whatwg mailing list