[whatwg] <base> elements, again
ian at hixie.ch
Mon May 9 13:08:20 PDT 2011
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 5/8/11 12:11 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627361
> > The conclusion seems to have been to attempt to keep the spec as it
> > stands, and try to get the remaining problems addressed via evangelism.
> > I approve of such an approach because it means I don't have to do
> > anything. Also, and more importantly, the spec as it stands now is
> > somewhat sane and pretty much any behaviour to address the remaining
> > compatibility issues moves us away from sanity.
> > Have there been more compatibility problems reported with<base> in the
> > past few months that would change this conclusion?
> We've had more reports of the Unicenter failure, but no other new issues
> reported, I believe.
Ok. I propose we keep a holding pattern on this and see if we can tough it
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg