[whatwg] SRT research: timestamps

[Ralph Giles]

On 10/10/11 12:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:

> 0 negative intervals
> 0 cues skipped because field counts were different

That will teach me to proofread after posting. The real counts should be:

2227 negative intervals
6822 cues skipped because field counts were different

>From which I conclude negative intervals aren't a significant problem.

Thanks for running my script!

 -r