[whatwg] SRT research: timestamps
giles at mozilla.com
Tue Oct 11 10:31:08 PDT 2011
On 10/10/11 12:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> 0 negative intervals
> 0 cues skipped because field counts were different
That will teach me to proofread after posting. The real counts should be:
2227 negative intervals
6822 cues skipped because field counts were different
>From which I conclude negative intervals aren't a significant problem.
Thanks for running my script!
More information about the whatwg