[whatwg] Three concerns regarding HTML5 form validation
Matias
matiasnu at gmail.com
Fri Sep 30 01:04:40 PDT 2011
On 29 sep 2011, at 18:25, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> I agree that this sounds like a good idea.
>>>
>>> One simple solution would be to make checkValidity take a optional
>>> boolean argument which defaults to false. If the function is called on
>>> a <form> and passed true, this instructs the UA to display the same UI
>>> as would be displayed if the form was submitted. If the function is
>>> called on a individual control and passed true, this instructs the UA
>>> to display any UI it would for that control.
>>>
>>> / Jonas
>>
>>
>> Exactly! http://twitter.com/#!/matiaslarsson/status/116887142516531201 :)
>
> I'd take a experimental gecko-patch if you write one :)
>
> / Jonas
Now, let's not get ahead of ourselves. ;) Sure I can try, but never even having looked at the Gecko source it might take awhile. (It might be an interesting experience for me though...)
/Matias
More information about the whatwg
mailing list