[whatwg] Missing alt attribute name bikeshedding (was Re: alt="" and the <meta name=generator> exception)
Maciej Stachowiak
mjs at apple.com
Sun Aug 5 17:31:00 PDT 2012
On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>
> We briefly brainstormed some ideas on #whatwg earlier tonight, and one
> name in particular that I think could work is the absurdly long
>
> <img src="..." generator-unable-to-provide-required-alt="">
>
> This has several key characteristics that I think are good:
>
> - it's long, so people aren't going to want to type it out
> - it's long, so it will stick out in copy-and-paste scenarios
> - it's emminently searchable (long unique term) and so will likely lead
> to good documentation if it's adopted
> - the "generator" part implies that it's for use by generators, and may
> discourage authors from using it
> - the "unable" and "required" parts make it obvious that using this
> attribute is an act of last resort
Here's a review of other proposed names and a few new ideas:
noalt
Pro: brief
Con: not very explanatory, so perhaps more likely to be misused
relaxed [suggested by Ted]
Pro: correctly conveys "relaxed validation"
Con: not clear what is relaxed or why
incomplete [suggested by Laura]
Pro: correctly conveys that a non-decorative content image is incomplete without a textual equivalent
Con: not clear what is incomplete or why
unknown
Pro: correctly conveys the reason for omitting alt, i.e. that the name is unknown to the generator
Con: might not be clear that it is not for human authors
unknown-to-generator
Pro: correctly conveys intended generator use
Con: not totally clear what it is that is unknown
I don't have a strong opinion, but I think generator-unable-to-provide-required-alt might be long to the point of silliness.
Cheers,
Maciej
More information about the whatwg
mailing list