[whatwg] RWD Heaven: if browsers reported device capabilities in a request header
jgraham at opera.com
Mon Feb 6 08:42:16 PST 2012
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 05:00:55 PM CET, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/6/12 10:52 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> 1) client asks for spdy://website.com
>> 2) server responds with content and adds a "request bandwidth& device
>> screen size header"
> Again, the "screen size" is not invariant during the lifetime of a
> page. We should not be encouraging people to think that it is....
No, but there is a different *typical* screen size/resolution for
mobile/tablet/desktop/tv and it is common to deliver different content
in each of these scenarios. Although people could load the same site on
desktop and mobile set up to have the same viewport dimensions, it is
not that probable and, only one of the two is likely to be resized.
A typical thing that people want to do is to deliver and display *less*
content in small (measured in arcseconds) screen scenarios. If you are
only going to show a subset of the full content it would be nice to
only do a subset of the backend work (database queries + etc.) and
transfer a subset of the full data. At the moment this is possible, but
you pay for it with an extra RTT (at least as far as I can tell). I am
sympathetic to the view that it would be desirable to be able to
minimise the cost of generating a reduced-functionality page without
burning the savings on extra round trips.
More information about the whatwg