[whatwg] RWD Heaven: if browsers reported device capabilities in a request header (Boris Zbarsky)
kornel at geekhood.net
Mon Feb 6 14:16:32 PST 2012
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:00:45 -0000, Irakli Nadareishvili
<irakli at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Adaptive images:
> To optimize user-experience on smart-phones (most of which have
> relatively small screens, and are on slow connections most of the time)
Be careful with generalizations like that.
Mobile devices can be connected to high-speed networks. Laptops can be
tethered via mobile networks.
There are many permutations of screen size, DPI, zoom, network speed,
bandwidth cost and memory availability that influence decision what image
resolution is best, and it's not as simple as "mobile" vs "non-mobile".
There aren't even clear "device classes". Basic device characteristics
like physical screen size and presence of a hardware keyboard can change
Smartphones can be connected to TVs and projectors. Tablets can be
connected to keyboards. Laptops can be flipped into tablet mode. Desktops
can have touchscreens — and these aren't obscure things. It's iPad with
AirPlay and dock. It's most tablet PCs. You can expect many laptops to
have touchscreens soon.
"Mobile" or "smartphone" can mean anything from Opera Mini on GPRS
connection to a quad-core 4G smartphones more powerful than desktops were
few years ago.
I appreciate optimisations you're trying to make, but simply reporting
basic capabilities in an HTTP header isn't going to work well in other
than few most common cases.
I hope we could come up with a better solution that can all the
optimisations and improved experience you want to achieve, but doesn't
have pitfalls of assuming that slow networks and touch screens go
hand-in-hand, or that devices with keyboards also have mouse and < 100dpi
CSS has media queries already. New queries can (and I think should) be
added to query more capabilities like presence of a touch screen (Mozilla
experiments with -moz-touch-enabled media query already).
switch from tablet's own touch screen to an external display, pages could
theoretically switch UI too.
> If server could easily detect device type/capabilities it would have the
> ability to tailor aggregated js/css files to a class of a device, thus
> providing greatly improved experience.
Sure, but it doesn't mean that the server has to do that and that it's the
only way to do that. For example:
<script src=touch-ui.js media="input-type: touch">
<script src=mouse-ui.js media="input-type: mouse">
(although I'm not suggesting using that form literally, as it has some
drawbacks of its own)
conditionally based on media-query-like declarations?
regards, Kornel Lesiński
More information about the whatwg