[whatwg] Encodings and the web
naruse at airemix.jp
Sun Jan 8 08:06:43 PST 2012
thank you for quick reply,
(2012/01/09 0:38), Lin Jen-Shin (godfat) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:20 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp> wrote:
>> (2012/01/08 23:32), Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:37:14 +0100, NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp> wrote:
>>>> = Legacy multi-octet Chinese (traditional) encodings
>>>> Mozilla supports another Big5 variants, Big5-UAO.
>>> As part of the big5 encoding, right? It sounds like it's a good idea to adopt that. I don't think there's much concern about table size these days, though obviously the less complexity the better.
>> CC to the original reporter.
>> Could you cooperate about current situation in Taiwan?
> I am not sure what I can do here, but I would try my best to
> coordinate if there's anything I could help.
> So what are we trying to solve here, again?
This is the thread from
And discussing about a spec about Encoding on the web.
I'm interesting about whether web browsers other than Mozilla should implement
Big5-UAO or not.
NARUSE, Yui <naruse at airemix.jp>
More information about the whatwg