[whatwg] iframe sandbox attribute
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Tue Jul 10 18:35:40 PDT 2012
On 7/10/12 12:27 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Since it doesn't for any other attributes that take a string but where
> empty string and absence are different, why is it suddenly an issue
> specifically with this attribute?
Because this is a new attribute we're defining and I happened to notice? ;)
> I think the situation would be different if you were asking about changing
> the behaviour of all content attributes rather than one specific one.
> That's what Simon is arguing for here:
> I'm not sure that makes sense either, but it's more plausible, IMHO,
> especially given that at least one UA apparently already does it. If Gecko
> also changed in this manner it would make the decision a lot easier. :-)
Hmm. That might be doable, in fact. I'll shop it around.
More information about the whatwg