[whatwg] Suggest making <dt> and <dd> valid in <ol>
Leif H Silli
xn--mlform-iua at xn--mlform-iua.no
Sun Jul 15 10:51:49 PDT 2012
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 23:53:32 +0800, from Ian Yang
>Okay, it seems that one of the ideas I mentioned in my original email
> needs
to be revamped.
>
>I was saying that using general heading (<H1>) and paragraph (<p>) loses
the meaning of "definition term" and "definition description", but I didn't
>realize that using <ol> loses the meaning of "definition list". That is,
the following code is, in fact, improper:
>
><!-- The following code is improper as it loses the meaning of "definition
list". -->
><ol>
> <li>
> <dt></dt>
> <dd></dd>
> </li>
> <li>
> <dt></dt>
> <dd></dd>
> </li>
> <li>
> <dt></dt>
> <dd></dd>
> </li>
></ol>
An XOXO list should solve this:
http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo#Properties_of_Outline_Items
Or just add a dl wrapper around the dt/dd elements in your code above.
--
Leif H Silli
More information about the whatwg
mailing list