[whatwg] Device proximity and light events
Tran, Dzung D
dzung.d.tran at intel.com
Wed May 9 07:45:07 PDT 2012
There is a discussion on the DAP WG, we like the simplicity of the proposal however there is an important feature that is missing which is ability to set the report interval and threshold.
From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Doug Turner
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 7:31 AM
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Jonas Sicking; whatwg at whatwg.org; Scott González; JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA; Andrei Popescu; Carr, Wayne
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Device proximity and light events
On May 9, 2012, at 3:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Doug Turner <dougt at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Where was that discussion?
> This came up at the WebApps F2F and there was general agreement that
> if we added new events adding new event handler attributes would make
Was there any notes taken?
> Feature detection of some kind is useful as forcing people to
> do UA sniffing leads to badness.
I am not arguing that it shouldn't be done. I just don't think it as important as most people. For example, even if the device is present, it may be off or not responding. In that case, you'll have a feature that tests positive and never receive any events.
More information about the whatwg