[whatwg] So if media-queries aren't for determining the media to be used what are they for?
Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalmage at gmail.com
Tue May 15 14:56:43 PDT 2012
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruce Lawson <brucel at opera.com> wrote:
> 1) the 600w 200h bit replicates the functionality of the familiar Media
> Queries syntax but in a new unfamiliar microsyntax which many have argued is
> ugly, unintuitive and prone to error
> I'm sympathetic to (2); why require a developer to think of and describe
> every permutation if the environment, when she could instead describe that
> which she knows - the images - and then allow the UA to take the decision.
> As time goes on, UAs get cleverer, so behaviour improves without the markup
> needing changing.
> But it doesn't seem necessary to saddle authors with (1) to acheive (2), as
> far as I can see.
I think I more or less agree with you. However, when you look at MQ,
literally the only things you want to decide on are width/height, and
*maybe* grayscale/color. You really don't need to be generic here, so
you might as well optimize the syntax to make it easier to type.
I think this is too much, personally. I'd prefer more verbosity here, like:
<img src=foo.jpg srcset="foo-big.jpg min-width:1000px, foo-big at 2.jpg
Importantly, I think I'd like to be able to use either min or max, but
@srcset's microsyntax only talks about min sizes. (I got it wrong in
my previous email.)
More information about the whatwg