[whatwg] Spec for location object needs to make some properties unforgeable; need supporting WebIDL changes

Boris Zbarsky bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Tue Sep 25 19:05:20 PDT 2012

On 9/25/12 9:48 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Boris Zbarsky:
>> I guess the question is whether we're more likely to need [Unforgeable]
>> on some other entire interface or whether were more likely to need
>> [Unforgeable] on a single member that's not a readonly attribute.  Of
>> course we might never need either one...
> I'm inclined to simplify now (by moving [Unforgeable] to the interface)
> and worry about it later if we need to.

I guess from my point of view, extending the existing member 
[Unforgeable] to a wider class of members without changing anything else 
about it seems simpler than having two separate meanings to 
[Unforgeable] depending on what it's decorating...  But maybe we're 
thinking about simplicity in different contexts?

(Note we'll still need single-readonly-attribute [Unforgeable] for 
several properties on Window and Document, no matter what we do with 


More information about the whatwg mailing list