[whatwg] Enabling LCD Text and antialiasing in canvas

[Stephen White]

Would Mozilla (or other browser vendors) be interested in implementing the
hint as Gregg described above?

If so, we could break out the LCD text issue from canvas opacity, and
consider the latter on its own merits, since it has benefits apart from LCD
text (i.e., performance). Regarding that, if I'm reading correctly,
Vladimir Vukicevic has expressed support on webkit-dev for the
ctx.getContext('2d', { alpha: false }) proposal (basically, a syntactic
rewrite of <canvas opaque>). Does this indeed have traction with other
browser vendors?

As for naming, I would prefer that it be something like ctx.fontSmoothing
or ctx.fontSmoothingHint, to align more closely with canvas's
ctx.imageSmoothingEnabled and webkit's -webkit-font-smoothing CSS property.
 -webkit-font-smoothing has "none", "antialiased" and
"subpixel-antialiased" as options. I think it's ok to explicitly call out
subpixel antialiasing, even if the platform (or UA) does not support it,
especially if the attribute explicitly describes itself as a hint.

Stephen


On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Gregg Tavares <gman at google.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert at ocallahan.org
> >wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Gregg Tavares <gman at google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Let me ask again in a different way ;-)  Specifically about LCD style
> >> antialiasing.
> >>
> >> What about a context attribute "antialiasRenderingQualityHint" for now
> >> with
> >> 2 settings "default" and "displayDependent"
> >>
> >>    context.antialiasRenderingQualityHint = "displayDependent"
> >>
> >
> > How would this interact with canvas opacity? E.g. if the author uses
> > displayDependent and then draws text over transparent pixels in the
> canvas,
> > what is the UA supposed to do?
> >
>
> Whatever the UA wants. It's a hint. From my POV, since the spec doesn't say
> anything about anti-aliasing then it really doesn't matter.
>
> My preference, if I was programming a UA, would be if the user sets
> "displayDependent" and the UA is running on a lo-dpi machine I'd
> unconditionally render LCD-AA with the assumption that the canvas is
> composited on white. If they want some other color they'd fill the canvas
> with as solid color first. Personally I don't think that needs to be
> specced, but it would be my suggestion. As I mentioned, even without this
> hint the spec doesn't prevent a UA from unconditionally using LCD-AA.
>
> Very few developers are going to run into issues. Most developers that use
> canvas aren't going to set the hint. Most developers that use canvas dont'
> make it transparent nor do they CSS rotate/scale them. For those few
> developers that do happen to blend and/or rotate/scale AND set the hint
> they'll get probably get some fringing but there (a) there was no guarantee
> they wouldn't already have that problem since as pointed out, the spec
> doesn't specify AA nor what kind, and (b) if they care they'll either stop
> using the hint or they'll search for "why is my canvas fringy" and the
> answer will pop up on stackoverlow and they can choose one of the
> solutions.
>
>
>
> >
> > Rob
> > --
> > Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
> > Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
> > bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
> > lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe
> fynir
> > — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
> > tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
> >
>