[whatwg] Should <video controls> generate click events?
Bob Lund
B.Lund at CableLabs.com
Tue Aug 20 15:57:14 PDT 2013
On 8/20/13 4:46 PM, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr.
><jackalmage at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
>> <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > IMHO, the example that Philip provided in http://people.opera.com/~**
>> > philipj/click.html <http://people.opera.com/~philipj/click.html> is
>>not
>> a
>> > realistic example of something a JS dev would do.
>>
>> Um, why not? Clicking on the video to play/pause is a useful
>> behavior, which things like the Youtube player do. Since <video>
>> elements don't generally do this, it seems reasonable that an author
>> could do pretty much exactly what Philip shows in his demo.
>>
>
>YouTube has their own controls for this, so Philip's example does not
>apply.
>
>What I'm saying is that the idea that the JS developer controls pause/play
>as well as exposes <video controls> is a far-fetched example.
What about a Web page that uses JS to control pause/play/etc based on
external messages, say from a WebSocket? The sender in this case acts as a
remote control.
>
>Silvia.
More information about the whatwg
mailing list