[whatwg] Is <main> now an official HTML5 element?
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Feb 13 09:06:52 PST 2013
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Ian Yang wrote:
>
> I saw the SitePoint article "Introducing the New HTML5 <main>
> Element<http://www.sitepoint.com/html5-main-element/>" yesterday. Does
> that mean <main> element has been approved by all editors of the working
> group?
<main> is currently in the HTML standard. That doesn't mean much, though.
What means something is that <main> is now implemented by two browsers in
their development builds. Once they ship in final versions, that's the
point at which we know that the feature is part of the platform.
> However, in spec, it still says that <main> element is not a sectioning
> element.
Correct. Broadly speaking, sectioning elements are those with headings;
<main> doesn't typically have a heading, it contains the content after the
heading, distinguishing it from the content that is "merely" heading and
navigation and so forth.
> That means, in document outline, main content will form another
> tree structure instead of appearing under the original website tree
> structure.
I'm not sure what you mean here. The main content doesn't appear in the
outline; the outline only contains the headers, essentially.
> Can we have somebody advise on this? Is there a special consideration to
> not making <main> a sectioning element?
There's already corresponding sectioning elements to indicate something
that is "main" content -- <article> or <section>, depending on what
exactly the content is.
The spec goes into some detail about this, including with examples, here:
http://whatwg.org/html#the-main-part-of-the-content
http://whatwg.org/html#the-main-element
http://whatwg.org/html#usage-summary-0
http://whatwg.org/html#sample-outlines
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list