[whatwg] seamless iframes and event propagation

Dimitri Glazkov dglazkov at chromium.org
Fri Jan 11 11:17:56 PST 2013


On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote:

>>> Normally with <b> being a child of <a> there would not be any
>>> adjustment.
>>
>> Yup. I don't understand whether you're just agreeing with me or disagreeing :)
>>
>> With shadow trees in place, we need to let them react to events
>> happening in nodes, distributed to insertion points.
>
> Is there any adjustment if offset* are computed on getting anyway?
> (Calling it adjustment if there's no actual adjustment (they're just
> relative to target) seems wrong.)

Whoops, sorry -- don't understand if we're talking about adjust
target/relativeTarget or offset* in the example. If the former, then
yes, it's really not any sort of adjustment. Just grab the current
value of target and compute on demand.

:DG<



More information about the whatwg mailing list