[whatwg] Forcing orientation in content
glenn at zewt.org
Fri Jul 12 21:17:15 PDT 2013
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote:
> If the content is sized better for portrait or landscape, then it's
generally good for the user if the mode is forced by the application.
> Otherwise the user will have to scroll, or will see content that is
> smaller than it otherwise would be.
I disagree completely. Even for landscape videos, I'd strongly prefer that
a video not force my phone to portrait. Leave my orientation alone, and
vertically letterbox the content, despite that giving a small viewing area.
That lets me rotate the device at my convenience, rather than rotating the
device on its own, so browser controls don't suddenly jump to a different
place (eg. if I decide to back out instead of viewing), and not forcing me
to rotate the device if I don't feel the need (eg. if it's a short clip and
the small viewing area is sufficient). Changing orientation is disruptive.
I can hardly imagine how obnoxious Web browsing would be on a mobile
device, if every second page I navigated to decided to flip my device to a
different orientation. This feels like the same sort of misfeature as
allowing pages to resize the browser window: "best viewed in 800x600" (so
we'll force it), "best viewed in portrait" (so we'll force it).
More information about the whatwg