[whatwg] Stack trace in window.onerror
james.m.greene at gmail.com
Wed Jul 24 14:27:21 PDT 2013
Thanks for clarifying/correcting both my comment and Hixie's!
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, James Greene wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Nathan Broadbent wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The current information passed to window.onerror rarely provides
> > > > > sufficient information to find the cause of the error. The column
> > > > > number argument will be a big step forward, but a stack trace would
> > > > > be especially useful. I would like to add my support for improving
> > > > > the window.onerror arguments, with a fifth argument for stack
> > > > > Is there anything that James or I could do to move this discussion
> > > > > along?
> > > >
> > > > This seems useful, but I don't think it's specific to window.onerror.
> > > > I would recommend approaching the es-discuss list about this.
> > >
> > > I'm curious: would do you say that? All evergreen browsers already
> > > include a `stack` property on their core `Error` prototypes, so it
> > > to me that the only thing preventing us from getting that useful
> > > information for unhandled errors is the fact that `window.onerror` does
> > > not provide us with a real Error object instances (or even fake ones
> > > with shell properties in the case of cross-domain errors).
> > Ah, I was unaware of Error.stack. Interesting!
> There is no static property with the name "stack" on the [[Global]]
> built-in Error object, nor is the property added to Error.prototype. In v8,
> SpiderMonkey and JSC, the stack property appears on the actual instance
> object initialized by Error.
More information about the whatwg