[whatwg] <imgset> responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

[Yoav Weiss]

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Adam Barth <w3c at adambarth.com> wrote:

>
> My apologies.  I thought Christian Biesinger addressed all these
> concerns with his proposal:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Christian Biesinger
> <cbiesinger at google.com> wrote:
> > For a bit more presentation, and while we're inventing new syntax
> > anyway, how about this:
> >
> > <style>
> > @media (min-width: 480px) {
> >   .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-small)); }
> > }
> > @media (min-width: 600px) {
> >   .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-medium)); }
> > }
> > @media (min-width: 800px) {
> >   .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-big)); }
> > }
> > </style>
> > ...
> > <img class="artdirected" src="foo.jpg" src-small="foo-small.jpg"
> > src-medium="foo-medium.jpg" src-big="foo-big.jpg">
>
> Specifically, his approach uses an <img> element, which addresses all
> four of Maciej's concerns.
>

You're right, Maciej's concerns were addressed by Christian's proposal (and
John's followup proposal).

Any thoughts on my concerns with making inline CSS mandatory (especially
from the CSP angle)?