[whatwg] <imgset> responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)
mat at matmarquis.com
Fri Nov 15 10:25:20 PST 2013
On Nov 15, at 12:27 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>> Any thoughts on my concerns with making inline CSS mandatory (especially
>>> from the CSP angle)?
>> CSP 1.1 supports securing inline style and script with nonces and/or
> OK, since the latest proposals keep the URLs outside the style, modifying
> the content image can keep the same style, assuming layout is identical. So
> these inline-style are not more likely to change than any other
> inline-styles and the authoring complexity is identical to other inline
> Still - I'm not sure such a solution is author friendly.
I’m just not sure what this proposal claims to handle or support that `src-n` doesn’t, apart from handling it with a slightly different syntax that’s subjectively preferred by a few people? Seems like it depends on a number of fairly large assumptions, but doesn’t really bring anything new to the table.
More information about the whatwg