[whatwg] The src-N proposal
Bruno Racineux
bruno at hexanet.net
Mon Nov 18 20:53:16 PST 2013
On 11/18/13 8:21 PM, "Ilya Grigorik" <igrigorik at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Bruno Racineux <bruno at hexanet.net> wrote:
>> Because these (only 0.2% uzing gzip) stats do not look good at all in
>> support of your theoretical argument:
>> http://trends.builtwith.com/Server/GZIP-Module
>
> That measures "mod_gzip" adoption.
>
> HTTP Archive tracks top 300K (Alexa) sites, and the actual number has been
> hovering ~70-75% for a long time:
> http://httparchive.org/trends.php#perCompressed
>
> </aside>
I suspected I was missing something.
Though httparchive stats are "number of compressed responses over the
number of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript requests" which is different that a per
website coverage. Correct?
I assumed the mod_gzip sits looks at the: 'Content-Encoding:gzip ' header.
Or what else could it look at?
Wouldn't this mean that low end site not in the top 300K on Alexa have a
much higher non-gzipped rate?
More information about the whatwg
mailing list