[whatwg] Add <input> "Switch" Type
jonas at sicking.cc
Tue Nov 19 01:37:07 PST 2013
Realistically speaking, I don't think this will help much at all. Few
websites like using the default styling for form controls anyway and
so people would be just as unhappy with the default switch rendering
as they are with the default checkbox rendering.
The real fix is to allow styling formcontrols. It's one of the most
requested features from web developers, yet no one has taken the time
to research what it would take to do it.
I'm quite sure that if someone comes up with a comprehensive and well
researched proposal, that browsers would jump on it.
And the fact that we now have shadow DOM defined should help a whole lot.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Mikko Rantalainen
<mikko.rantalainen at peda.net> wrote:
> Brian M. Blakely, 2013-09-21 02:03 (Europe/Helsinki):
>> I was contemplating whether to propose a new input type, or an
>> attribute valid only for checkboxes. But it isn't a checkbox, so I
>> went with a new type value. You can choose to slide the switch or
>> click it in most OS implementations, so even the behavior is
>> different from a checkbox.
> I agree that the look and feel is different from checkbox but all the
> differences seem to be purely presentational. If you disagree, you need to
> elaborate a bit more.
> I'd suggest pursuing something along the lines
> appearance: lightswitch;
> instead. That way you could use CSS media queries and use "lightswitch"
> appearance for narrow viewports and regular checkboxes for wider viewports.
> However, if you're requesting for more featured switch seen in e.g. newer
> Android applications where the switch has embedded text labels to declare
> the switch positions, there might be need for a new markup.
> An example of such UI in ASCII graphics:
> | 蚓 |========== 蚌 =| Temperature unit
> (That is, a label "Temperature unit" with a switch with labels "degree
> Celcius" and "degree Fahrenheit". In the real UI the label is on the left
> and switch is aligned to right margin but I put it this way to have a
> slightly better change for ASCII graphics to work correctly.)
> I personally hate this UI and would much prefer using two radio buttons for
> this. Still, this is a native UI concept on this platform and I see no
> reasonable way to convert a real HTML radio button group into this using
> just CSS. The closest thing is allowing to allow rendering a <select>
> element with just options with a "lightswitch" appearance.
More information about the whatwg