[whatwg] Alignment of empty buttons
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Fri Nov 22 18:57:35 PST 2013
On 11/22/13 9:41 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Sure, <option>s are replaced elements either.
You mean aren't?
Except in UAs where they seem to be, right?
For what it's worth, <select> didn't use to be in Gecko either, in this
sense, until we made it so in
> I agree that it's vaguer than ideal, and it might be wrong, but it's not
> _that_ vague. It says "An element whose content is outside the scope of
> the CSS formatting model", and <button>s contents aren't outside the scope
> of the CSS formatting model. It seems pretty cut and dry to me.
Is <svg:foreignObject> a replaced element? Why or why not?
Maybe my point is that this definition has little to do with what UAs
are actually doing...
> Well, then we should fix CSS.
More information about the whatwg