[whatwg] Alignment of empty buttons
ian at hixie.ch
Sun Nov 24 17:12:34 PST 2013
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 11/22/13 9:41 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Sure, <option>s are replaced elements either.
> You mean aren't?
Right. They have nothing to do with CSS.
> Except in UAs where they seem to be, right?
They aren't replaced elements, by the CSS definition in any UA, as far as
I can tell.
> > I agree that it's vaguer than ideal, and it might be wrong, but it's
> > not _that_ vague. It says "An element whose content is outside the
> > scope of the CSS formatting model", and <button>s contents aren't
> > outside the scope of the CSS formatting model. It seems pretty cut and
> > dry to me.
> Is <svg:foreignObject> a replaced element? Why or why not?
No, since the insides of <svg:foreignObject> are clearly in scope of the
CSS formatting model.
> Maybe my point is that this definition has little to do with what UAs
> are actually doing...
Well, that's an issue for www-style, I guess.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg