[whatwg] scrdoc and session history don't play along in the spec
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Sep 4 17:03:52 PDT 2013
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/12/13 3:39 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > That wasn't the intent. I've tried to clarify it.
>
> Hmm. It might help to make it clearer in
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/history.html#navigate
> that "new resource" does not mean "URL". Maybe have some explicit thing
> that represents the resource being navigated to (which might, for
> example, consist of a (url, srcdoc data) pair or something along those
> lines)?
Yeah... I've thought about doing something like this several times (this
is by far not the only part of the spec with this issue -- the word
"resource" is in the spec over a thousand times).
Fundamentally I'm not really sure what to do to define "resource" in a
useful way here and elsewhere.
I've added a note before the navigation algorithm, though.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list