[whatwg] scrdoc and session history don't play along in the spec
ian at hixie.ch
Wed Sep 4 17:03:52 PDT 2013
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/12/13 3:39 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > That wasn't the intent. I've tried to clarify it.
> Hmm. It might help to make it clearer in
> that "new resource" does not mean "URL". Maybe have some explicit thing
> that represents the resource being navigated to (which might, for
> example, consist of a (url, srcdoc data) pair or something along those
Yeah... I've thought about doing something like this several times (this
is by far not the only part of the spec with this issue -- the word
"resource" is in the spec over a thousand times).
Fundamentally I'm not really sure what to do to define "resource" in a
useful way here and elsewhere.
I've added a note before the navigation algorithm, though.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg