[whatwg] Proposal: requestBackgroundProcessing()
mjs at apple.com
Thu Feb 20 10:51:43 PST 2014
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at MIT.EDU> wrote:
>> On 2/20/14 11:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> (If people used rAF for what it was *intended* for, we could probably
>> have stopped firing it *entirely* when the window isn't visible.
> We do. At least Chrome and Firefox do.
>> Instead, we had to compromise with the 1s refresh rate instead.)
> That's what Chrome and Firefox do for setTimeout/setInterval.
We actually clamp timers even more for background tabs if the page has not done anything externally observable (e.g. Send or receive network data) in a while.
More information about the whatwg