On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Robert O'Callahan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert@ocallahan.org">robert@ocallahan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Sander van Zoest <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sander@vanzoest.com" target="_blank">sander@vanzoest.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="Ih2E3d">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
By the way, the "pixel-aspect-ratio" on video caps in the GStreamer<br>
framework has precisely the same meaning as this attribute, overriding<br>
it on a video sink also has an effect similar to what is suggested in<br>
the HTML5 spec. In other words, it's not so outlanding from a media<br>
framework's point of view.</blockquote></div><div><br>In the capture world it makes a lot of sense. You are converting analog content<br>into digital. It is my understanding that HTML5 is presentation technology, not<br>
a video capture, transcoding or editing framework.</div></div></blockquote></div><div><br>Video capture is getting popular on the Web, so it would not be surprising to see HTML5 extend in that direction in the future.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Sure, let's cross that bridge when we get there. I certainly can see usb-type cams and mics, but that is quite different then a full on video capture framework.<br><br>-- Sander<br></div></div>
<br>